
Gubernatorial candidates hold debate at University
The forum, held in Columbia 150, centered on the appropriate method to
improve the funding of higher education in Oregon
May 4, 2006
By Calvin Hall
Democratic, Independent and
Pacific Green gubernatorial candidates came to the University Tuesday and
amicably debated about how to improve and fund Oregon’s higher education system.
Democrats Jim Hill and Pete Sorenson, Independent Ben Westlund, Pacific Green
candidate Joe Keating and Courtney Warner, a representative for Democrat
incumbent Gov. Ted Kulongoski, presented their platforms and answered questions
from audience members in 150 Columbia.
Each candidate gave a seven-minute introduction and open statement on topics
provided beforehand. In the following hour-long session, candidates had three
minutes to respond to each question. Warner refused to participate in the
question-and-answer section.
Emeritus political science professor and moderator Jerry Medler said he had
hoped the questions would pertain to education, but audience members’ questions
touched on topics ranging from tuition to the environment and corporate
contributions.
Most candidates spent their time criticizing Gov. Kulongoski’s leadership and
the state of education in Oregon.
Hill said that in terms of governors’ popularity, Kulongoski ranked third to
last according to SurveyUSA, and joked that the other two were probably under
indictment. Sorenson, Kulongoski’s most vocal critic at the forum, said
Kulongoski lacked leadership skills. Sorenson received a large round of applause
when he said it was immoral that so many people in the state lacked health
insurance.
Warner, a 2005 graduate of the University, spoke on behalf of Kulongoski. She
said the governor’s success was proof of higher education’s effectiveness,
noting that he was able to attend college because of the GI Bill. She also
highlighted Kulongoski’s Education Enterprise plan, which she said seeks to
reduce college tuition, improve education programs and expand community colleges
for people who cannot afford to attend a four-year college.
Warner said that when Kulongoski was elected, Oregon was running a multi-billion
dollar deficit and had the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Now more
Oregonians are working, she said, and the state has the fifth-fastest growing
economy in the nation. She said Kulongoski is looking for student support in his
re-election campaign.
“With our economy on the rebound, we can invest in priorities for Oregonians
like education, health care and increasing our energy independence,” Warner
said.
Each candidate offered ideas on cutting tuition and funding Oregon’s education.
Hill, a former state treasurer who ran for governor in 2002, said improving
Oregon’s funding and investing in students are the most important challenges
facing higher education. The three most important things for the state are
education, education and education, he said, attributing the statement to a
former North Carolina governor. He added that the governor has a role in
securing money for the universities.
Hill, who said he grew up in Atlanta, attended an all-black university because
the University of Georgia didn’t accept black students at the time. He said his
undergraduate experiences shaped his character. After graduating in 1964 he left
Georgia to attend Michigan State University, but he still drew a lot of
attention and stares from white students. He wondered whether they were reacting
to him personally or to the color of his skin, he said.
“After a while, I came to the conclusion that if they’re looking at me as
something other than who I am, that’s their problem,” Hill said. “I lifted a
great weight off my shoulders, and I said I’m here to be myself. In fact I’m
everywhere to be myself, and if those people don’t like it, it’s their problem.”
Westlund, an Independent state senator and former Republican,
described himself as a husband, father and entrepreneur. Despite winning his
seat in 2004 with Democrat and Republican endorsements, he said he recently
became an Independent because good public policy had been affected by extreme
partisan politics and gridlock. He said he was the only candidate with the
budget experience and proven ability to fix Oregon’s fiscal system, especially
for the benefit of education.
“As a state representative since 1996 and as a state senator in 2003, I brought
people together and worked across party lines to find the best solutions for
real problems,” Westlund said. “As governor, I will bridge the gap between
Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives.”
Keating, a long-time Oregon activist and co-founder of the Pacific Green party,
said students are burdened with debt after graduating college and are forced to
work for “the man” to pay it off.
“To me, that is not what education is about,” Keating said.
The state should work to help pay off student debt, he said and added that his
campaign is also looking for new creative ideas to save money and solve the
problems in the state. He said he didn’t have all of the answers, but was
considering talking to students to gather ideas.
Sorenson, a former state senator and a current Lane County commissioner, also
worked on James Weaver’s congressional campaign and helped defeat a four-term
incumbent while a student at the University, he said. It would only take 160,000
voters to defeat Kulongoski in the primary and create a progressive Oregon, he
told the audience.
Sorenson said tuition was a much different situation when he was a student. When
he attended the University he said it was possible to graduate with just a year
of debt if a student worked a minimum-wage job while studying, but now his
daughter, a senior at the University, pays more in income taxes than two-thirds
of most corporations.
He suggested that the state should be involved in loan-forgiveness and promised
to set an agenda to lower tuition.
The event was sponsored by the Pi Sigma Alpha honor society for students of
government and politics, and it was the first time the debate has been hosted on
campus, Chelsea Byers, the society’s president, said.
“We were very persistent as far as calling their campaign consultants,” Byers
said.
Byers said the Republican candidates had been contacted, but none were able to
attend because of scheduling conflicts.
The candidates declined to attack their opponents. Westlund said he attended
previous debates with Hill and Sorenson and praised their participation,
although he disputed Sorenson’s claim that Sorenson was the only candidate in
the voter’s pamphlet addressing Oregon’s finances.
“We’re all going to be in good shape if one of these candidates wins,” Keating
said.
![]()